There exists a very respectable liberal school which does not hate Waterloo. We do not belong to it. —
To us, Waterloo is but the stupefied date of liberty. —
That such an eagle should emerge from such an egg is certainly unexpected.
If one places one’s self at the culminating point of view of the question, Waterloo is intentionally a counter-revolutionary victory. —
It is Europe against France; it is Petersburg, Berlin, and Vienna against Paris; —
it is the statu quo against the initiative; —
it is the 14th of July, 1789, attacked through the 20th of March, 1815; —
it is the monarchies clearing the decks in opposition to the indomitable French rioting. —
The final extinction of that vast people which had been in eruption for twenty-six years–such was the dream. —
The solidarity of the Brunswicks, the Nassaus, the Romanoffs, the Hohenzollerns, the Hapsburgs with the Bourbons. —
Waterloo bears divine right on its crupper. —
It is true, that the Empire having been despotic, the kingdom by the natural reaction of things, was forced to be liberal, and that a constitutional order was the unwilling result of Waterloo, to the great regret of the conquerors. —
It is because revolution cannot be really conquered, and that being providential and absolutely fatal, it is always cropping up afresh: —
before Waterloo, in Bonaparte overthrowing the old thrones; —
after Waterloo, in Louis XVIII. granting and conforming to the charter. —
Bonaparte places a postilion on the throne of Naples, and a sergeant on the throne of Sweden, employing inequality to demonstrate equality; —
Louis XVIII. at Saint-Ouen countersigns the declaration of the rights of man. —
If you wish to gain an idea of what revolution is, call it Progress; —
and if you wish to acquire an idea of the nature of progress, call it To-morrow. —
To-morrow fulfils its work irresistibly, and it is already fulfilling it to-day. —
It always reaches its goal strangely. It employs Wellington to make of Foy, who was only a soldier, an orator. —
Foy falls at Hougomont and rises again in the tribune. Thus does progress proceed. —
There is no such thing as a bad tool for that workman. —
It does not become disconcerted, but adjusts to its divine work the man who has bestridden the Alps, and the good old tottering invalid of Father Elysee. —
It makes use of the gouty man as well as of the conqueror; —
of the conqueror without, of the gouty man within. —
Waterloo, by cutting short the demolition of European thrones by the sword, had no other effect than to cause the revolutionary work to be continued in another direction. —
The slashers have finished; it was the turn of the thinkers. —
The century that Waterloo was intended to arrest has pursued its march. —
That sinister victory was vanquished by liberty.
In short, and incontestably, that which triumphed at Waterloo; —
that which smiled in Wellington’s rear; that which brought him all the marshals’ staffs of Europe, including, it is said, the staff of a marshal of France; —
that which joyously trundled the barrows full of bones to erect the knoll of the lion; —
that which triumphantly inscribed on that pedestal the date “June 18, 1815”; —
that which encouraged Blucher, as he put the flying army to the sword; —
that which, from the heights of the plateau of Mont-Saint-Jean, hovered over France as over its prey, was the counter-revolution. —
It was the counter-revolution which murmured that infamous word “dismemberment.” —
On arriving in Paris, it beheld the crater close at hand; —
it felt those ashes which scorched its feet, and it changed its mind; —
it returned to the stammer of a charter.
Let us behold in Waterloo only that which is in Waterloo. Of intentional liberty there is none. —
The counter-revolution was involuntarily liberal, in the same manner as, by a corresponding phenomenon, Napoleon was involuntarily revolutionary. —
On the 18th of June, 1815, the mounted Robespierre was hurled from his saddle.